Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Zahir's avatar

A very clear and succinct summary here, P

As one of the roaming chefs in question, who’s been in this odd arm of the industry for a decade - the shift from mutually beneficial agreement between chef and venue (we’ll take the hassle of the creativity, staffing and hours of cooking in your venue - and drive your wet sales and PR lines and you give us a cheap, if imperfect, kitchen to cook from) to our labour being written into exploitative business models came quick. There are venues operating entirely on the external inertia of their guest chefs asking for 50% plus of takings, and chefs are so desperate to get their names out, that they’re gladly taking these opportunities.

I get it, but it’s also driven the %’s being asked for through the roof - the whole model is now flawed, unless you find that unicorn of a space that recognises the benefit of the original pop up model.

So so many horrific examples I can think of at the drop of a hat - and so hard to call out as an operator for fear of being seen as a trouble maker.

Expand full comment
Jenny Lau's avatar

You raise such good points Pani, and I am sure you're aware that many roaming chefs are being screwed over left, right and centre by these residency spaces. I'm hearing about pop up chefs who are being shuffled like songs on a playlist (apt analogy). Just 5 minutes ago, a friend of mine shared his exasperation with me about how he had been booked into a residency in a small plates/jazz bar venue (vom) who replaced him without notice.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts